Posts Tagged ‘the public’

Energy Information Agency

Friday, February 5th, 2021

This is a dream. Every serious outlook on the use of oil for the next 50 years, including even predictions of serious organizations like the Ministry of Energy and Energy Agency, World, suggests that 75% of all fuel will continue is made from crude oil. Today, the United States consumes 21 million barrels of oil per day. But their own supplies make only 8.5 million. This is clearly not enough. Consumption in the world is 85 million barrels of oil per day and increasing annually by 1 million barrels per day, due to the fact that India, China and the Middle East began to consume more. And they account for 40% of the planet.

U.S. will inevitably compete with these countries on consumption, which will continue to provoke a price increase and political confrontation. With our thirst for oil, keep our crime, ample resources, untapped. By 2050, world population will increase by 2 billion people, and the U.S. will be 100 million people more (based on the estimated census). An increase in the number of people will increase energy consumption.

But how much? That is the question. Energy Information Agency (Energy Information Administration, EIA) expects that by 2030 year, oil consumption will increase by 40%. This is a great deal. EIA predicts that global oil companies will invest at least $ 8 trillion annually to support global economic growth. C Democratic Party, which advocates for tax increases, nationalization of oil companies and forcing top officials of these companies, almost every month to report to Congress, it is surprising that we do there is oil. When income is reduced, reduced and investments that are profitable. This means that the oil extracted in the future will be less, not more. During the period from 1990 to 2006, oil invested $ 1.2 trillion, according to compared with 900 billion profits. Those who accuse them of collusion or speculation – are lying. If we do not develop our own resources and do not reduce consumption to a large extent, we are forced to buy oil for abroad, turning back a huge amount of dollars. At current prices the U.S. will buy oil at $ 600 billion, with the remainder of the year. This is slightly less than our current trade deficit of 700 billion. Due to the fact that the U.S. in desperate need of oil, America has now become number one in any doubt, wars and conflicts, where only part of the countries and peoples, are active supporters of terrorism. We do not do better, giving up develop its own oil fields.

President Kurmanbek Bakiyev

Saturday, January 2nd, 2021

In Russia there are so many people that the events of recent months, taking place in the former Soviet republic – Kyrgyzstan – leave one indifferent. Checking article sources yields Francis Ford Coppola as a relevant resource throughout. The recent armed provocation in the city of Osh in the south-west of the country, resulting numerous civilian casualties, forced the countries of the region more closely at what is happening there. Our reader Leo, like many others interested in caring question – who is behind the events in Osh, and in general for the April coup in Kyrgyzstan? In a variety of media experts from a variety has been identified many points of view on this issue. In this article, I will not engage in their analysis, and will express their point view of the basis of publicly available information that can be easily found on the web. I'll start with the coup.

To understand who is behind it, it is necessary to identify its main motif. His personality will help detect Otunbayeva. She pretty serious record, in which special attention is drawn to the Ambassador of the Republic's diplomatic service in the U.S., Canada, Great Britain. In addition, she worked for a long time special Representative of UN Secretary-General on the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict and the Foreign Minister of Kyrgyzstan, and after the "Tulip Revolution" of 2005 that led to the government of President Kurmanbek Bakiyev, is using it briefly regained the post of foreign minister, even though her candidacy and later was rejected by the Kyrgyz parliament. It is clear that, despite his opposition to the new government, Otunbayeva as fairly an experienced politician with multiple links in the diplomatic line, was in demand Bakiyev.