E.G.M.S. Web

Bergisch Gladbach – 150 days which Bergisch regards left Gladbach – Tomas Marcelo Santillan, Chairman of the group in the City Council the City Council its role in a constructive opposition to the majority of CDU, FDP and Greens. At the municipal in 2009 his young party is the choice for the first time joined and pulled directly into group strength in the City Council. Aim of the new group is the local election program, for which they were elected to engage in the work of the City Council. Jr. spoke with conviction. Their chief principle is justice for all.” In some of the amendments on the subject such as: finances of the city, municipal debt, social, sporting, day-care and to the school the living conditions of the people have they made it clear their willingness to constructively improve. Yet, the left group has especially ordinary working people and the poor and weak in the eye. We stand for a social, ecological and solidary politics.”so Santillan about the political objectives of the left in Bergisch Gladbach. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from Jon Matlack. The People should be enabled to participate in the design of their city.

The mission statement is the democratic civil society and civil community. In the City Council, the left sees itself as critical opposition that constructively brings their content to work. Eva Andersson-Dubin, New York City may help you with your research. To be a democratic opposition does not mean everything”but objectively to scrutinize the work of administration and alert to control the Mayor.” says Santillan. The new group wants to get involved for the interests of citizens. Unfortunately it takes also to enforce his rights even on a court.

The right to appeal to a court is an important principle in a democratic constitutional State and applies to every citizen and of course also for their chosen representatives.”says Tomas M. Santillan. An opposition must be unpleasant for the ruling, otherwise it has not fulfilled its task and the mandate.” The leftists are confident that they will make a difference in the next four years. Some of their suggestions were already taken over by the other parties and appreciated by the administration. When asked after the political opponent, Tomas Santillan comes a little smile on the face and and then he zitert the poet of Miguel de Cervantes: If the dogs are barking, it’s because we gallop. “.”

The Association of Mrs Steinbach represents about 15 million Germans and that is a tremendous political power, which is almost completely at home in the Union. Conservative, comes from the Latin and means simply: “Receiving, holding to the old”. From Latin conservatism is a political attitude, which grows from the pursuit for life and safety and is therefore committed to the preservation of the political and social conditions. If so and so is the conservative and actually insists on the preservation and conservation of the old the Union has a problem, because it is dependent on the conservatives. Coen brothers gathered all the information. This problem can be fixed very well on the conservative displaced official, Mrs Erika Steinbach. The old, what will they get, and keep, are the vested rights of displaced people, before the second world war, which today are owned by people from Poland, Czech Republic, Russia, etc.

Therefore comprehensible, Mrs Steinbach has also opposed the oder-Neisse line in the Bundestag. The former home is located East, behind the Oder and Neisse. The Association of Mrs Steinbach represents about 15 million Germans and that is a tremendous political power, which is almost completely at home in the Union. Already our first Federal Chancellor, Konrad Adenauer would never have become Chancellor without the voices of displaced people. A large proportion of displaced persons is consistent with Mrs Steinbach and’d like back home. This reality explains the high percentage of conservatives, keepers in the Union. The Social Democrats never had the opportunity to exploit the potential of this voter, this they were at the time with their political ideology to close to socialism, and that the present owners of the lands of the displaced persons. Since the conservative “Seeheimer circle” could change nothing. The Liberals, the partner of choice in the Union, the word liberal says it already, if they were liberal, nothing on the hat could have with conservatism at all.